Hello, I very much like that it is so easy to extend PostgreSQL in various ways, including adding server-side languages (for triggers and other stored procedures) as dynamically loadable modules. But somehow the thought that some people actually seem to use PHP as a server-side language, or consider making it possible to use JavaScript, makes me very afraid (recent discussion on the general pg mailing list.) Should PostgreSQL have a taint flag like the kernel?
(Admittedly JS is a side effect of also enabling Lua and Scheme, which may make more sense.)
Update 20100618: Added Debconf info.
The famous Debian Umbrellas (big picture) have finally arrived, so I'm keen to get rid of them. Order yours now!
Information about Debconf: I'm not coming to Debconf. But Luca Capello was friendly enough to offer to carry some umbrellas. Coordination via the wiki, orders need to be placed before June 27th.
A somewhat na ve young man, a kidnapping, a policeman's daughter, a night club singer, said policeman's partner being involved, a love triangle, a pervert and (probably because it's Lynch) a cut off ear. What more do you need ... ? Or, in other words, I absolutely regret not having seen Blue Velvet before.
In contrast, Pink Flamingos takes its fight over the title of the filthiest woman alive (which sets the whole plot in motion) a bit too literal for my taste. I like movies that leave more things up to the imagination of the spectator. Or perhaps it's just that my sense of aesthetics doesn't agree with John Water's.
(And to the person who knew nothing bettter to say than You idiot to my negative critique about Tarantino's Inglourious Basterds: I don't delete comments on my blog that don't agree with me. But I do not tolerate personal attacks. Post it to your own blog. You're as entitled to your opinion as I am.)
Probably it's just a question of me not paying enough attention to the news... So: pointers welcome.
There are quie a few shiny new filesystems for local storage, like btrfs or HAMMER (and nilfs, Tux3, ext4, Reiser4...)
It seems the distributed storage side is covered as well, with ceph being merged recently. There are other systems (like, for example, Lustre), but they haven't appeared much in the news channels I tend to read. What I'd be curious is if any of these support hierarchical storage architectures like pushing out rarely used data to tape libraries. (But this is just idle speculation, I don't need this anywhere.)
But what I would really need is a replacement for NFS (v3): a classical client-server filesystem. I'm not sure NFSv4 is the right solution (where I'd use it, I currently can't because we rely too much on POSIX ACLs there, making the transition to NFSv4 quite a chore.) I think POHMELFS might be a solution in the long term, or CRFS, but I'm not sure how much progress there is on these; apt-cache search is silent, not a good sign. There's Samba 4 I guess I'll have to look at it, since it's supposed to be much cleaner and nicer to use than its predecessors and might be a good solution even if no Microsoft systems are involved. Is this what small environments (a fileserver and 100 clients or so) will want to use? Comments are very welcome.
The joys of a new employer ... only 5min by bike to the office instead of 1h by train. And, of course, we're using Debian a lot, and I may do the odd bit of Debian work on company time. Like, right now, working with Klaus Zerwes on getting JWhoisServer uploaded. I hope more opportunities come up.
I guess having only the Japanese version of Tetsuo and not understanding anything might not have helped, but on the other hand there isn't all that much dialogue. Tetsuo is one of those movies I find difficult to judge; while it has some great moments, I also found it to be a bit long in some parts. Very good sound track, though. YMMV, I guess.
If you like the Discworld novels by Terry Pratchett, you may want to have a peak at Terry Pratchett's The Colour of Magic, which I found quite well made (... and where I once again found that I don't have a good memory for faces, although in the end I remembered where I saw Twoflower's face just before reading the name in the closing credits ...) A bit disappointing, in contrast, was Terry Pratchett's Hogfather: to me, it proves that a movie should have some distance to the book, since what works when written down doesn't necessarily work on the screen. I quite liked Michelle Dockery as Susan, though.
Update: I'm taking orders now.
I was planning to take orders for
the Debian Swirl umbrella starting tonight, but a bit of research showed that shipping prices for parcels are insane (CHF 37 for europe), but it seems I can get away with sending this as a Swiss Post Maxi Letter instead, which would result in a shipping price of CHF 12.50 for four and CHF 24 for up to eight umbrellas (1kg or 2kg.) So now I'll go and look into getting some kind of flattish box to stay within the allowed dimensions before I can be sure this is possible. In any case, I expect the delivery in the first week of June.
Since I'll not be coming to Debconf, it would be nice if somebody could take some umbrellas to New York. I'm currently not travelling much, so I'd have to rely on a friendly volunteer. (I'm based in Basel, Switzerland; I am known to go to Z rich regularly.)
Whew. Thank God I did download that one and not spend money on it. If you're trying to poke fun (or be satirical) at the Nazis, do it like Chaplin, or do it like Monty Python. Inglourious Basterds is just not funny and hasn't got enough substance to be satire. It's just fooling around by people with too big an ego and too much money. I'm extremely disappointed with Tarantino here; I liked his other movies and had expected quite a bit more here. I'm not surprised to see Brad Pitt in such a movie (he's not a bad actor, but I've always had the impression that he's not picky about the roles he's playing), and Uma Thurman gets bonus points for not appearing :-)
It just occurs to me that as well as completely missing the mark with the plot here, Tarantino also utterly fails at assembling a gripping soundtrack. Coincidence? If we ignore all this, the film is at least well made, and most of the actors show a good performance (I particularly like Christoph Waltz being the complete asshole.)
(On second thought: now, he didn't miss the mark with the plot, but with the way he's been filming it. Use the same plot but do it as a slapstick comedy, I think it could have been really funny. Use the same basic plot but take it seriously, it might have been a real thrilling war movie. Etc. So the plot is not to blame.)
The Android developers seem to feel that they have been singled out for a level of criticism which few other embedded vendors including those demonstrating much worse community behavior have to deal with.This is from Jonathan Corbet's coverage of the Collaboration Summit and matches my impression. I guess what some Google folks don't necessarily see is that they work for a company that has a big sign outside that effectively says we are not Microsoft or Apple or Sony or the RIAA/MPAA (implied: we're the good guys.) If you put up such a sign, and then disappoint people's expectations, you got to live with the consequences. (Google's marketing was once more successful with their recent actions in China. Get lots of good press coverage, get rid of quite a few critics, and pull out of a market where you didn't make big money in any case.)
The friend who lent me his Kottan ermittelt DVDs gave me the 1981 movie (cinema, not TV) Den T chtigen geh rt die Welt. I guess a warning is in order: if you liked the TV series, it's possible that you'll share my disappointment with this film. There are reports of a new movie to be made this year, and I also haven't seen the first 9 episodes of the TV series yet, so I'll probably report on Kottan again some time in the future.
I was surprised but liked the film: There's a coherent plot and even a happy end. And it's till a film by David Lynch: Wild at Heart. Also by Lynch: the very early Eraserhead. Now this is Lynch (at least for me, since I started with Lost Highway and Mulholland Drive ), and I really like the hairstyle of Henry Spencer.
Something completely different: Harold and Maude, or what happens when a bored high society youth falls in love with an 80 years old eccentric who shares his hobby of going to funerals of some random people.
Conditions for ordering: Not yet. The umbrella will be available ca. end of May, I'll give details about ordering it then. Information so far: CHF 25 per umbrella (ca. EUR 17 / USD 23), including ca. CHF 6 donation to Debian (via debian.ch); at least at first, I plan to ship in lots of 5 or more to save postage. International travellers should coordinate... (if you're close to Basel, Switzerland, you will obviously be able to get one directly as well.)
So, stay tuned for the next announcement here.
The answer is probably no way! I like the way Jon Corbet put it (article will be free in a few weeks):
The SCO affair is kind of like a bad zombie movie; the plot is implausible, the acting is horrible, and, even though you know the good guys must win in the end, that obnoxious zombie just keeps coming back and ruining the party.Realistically, what will happen? The judge in the Chapter 11 case has so far been quite interested in helping SCO succeed, so I guess there will be an appeal on this. The contract claims in the cases surrounding this are probably not very relevant, so I'm not sure how much press they'll get (although I'm sure Pam will continue to cover the issue although I think the Apple vs. Hitachi patent cause should be the one that should be in the center of attention right now.) And, of course, there's the Canonical vs. SPI lawsuit coming up. I find it very difficult to tell in what direction that will get decided, but I hope it won't take as long as the SCO case.
As a complete outsider and with my obvious bias as a Debian Developer: how can anybody call Ubuntu a community distribution when it's obvious that Canonical and Mark Shuttleworth can, and will, take decisions for reasons that are not made clear, and with only little or no community involvment?
This rethorical question refers, of course, to the current debate about purple vs. brown and the best position of the window close button (Bug report and LWN coverage.)
Conclusion? Let's be fair and call it a community support commercial distribution. Perhaps we should found a non-profit to award a (trademarked) True Community Effort label to operating system distributions where no commercial body has the final say?
Q1: Which programming construct is closely linked to Apple? (No, customer lock-in is not a programming construct.)
Q2: Find the birthdate of one of the PostgreSQL developers and find out who it likely is.
Q1 should be trivial. My answer to Q2 is not verified, so this is more a quiz of do you think the same. Both answers are found on the web.
Another attempt to shorten my list of movies where not having seen them makes me an absolute philistine, according to various friends: Papillon, with Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffmann. Ignoring the tragic history behind it (the French penal system in French Guiana during the colonial era I didn't know about this from school), it's great entertainment. There is a kind of happy end, but nowhere close to what Hollywood does to its stories these days...
A long time on the to watch list: The Fifth Element by Luc Besson. I don't know why but I had always been sceptical if I'd enjoy this one, but my feeling was completely wrong. Real fun.
While I think the basic idea of superheroes getting older and having a midlife crisis, or a daughter, (and of course during the film, getting back into action) could make a wonderful film, the ending of Watchmen left me with a bad feeling about the whole film. But then I never read or watched superhero cartoons anyway, so maybe it's just that I'm not the intended audience for this one.
Finally, V for Vendetta is another interpretation of the 1984 theme (actually, it's the interpretation of a graphic novel, but I've not read that), with a very well chosen John Hurt as Big Brother (or, I should say, High Chancellor Adam Sutler.) With quite a few slapstick moments, this isn't really as dark as the theme might suggest.
Playing around a bit with ssh tunneling right now. When I create a kind of VPN concentrator with a few tun interfaces: is there any reason why I can't just assign the same IP on all these tun interfaces? A quick test shows this set up working nicely, with ifconfig tunX localip pointopoint remoteip (the localip part being the same) setting up the routes to chose the right tun device for all remote IP addresses, and ping worked just fine for me. Firewall rules will always have the remote IP and/or the interface name to decide when a packet applies.
Obviously setting up a listening socket at only one of these interfaces is not so trivial now since I can't just listen to the IP, but that's a restriction I'm happy with. Anything else I'm not thinking of right now?
Maybe we could define the [ACPI] APIs so that they work well with NT and not the others even if they are open.Bill Gates, 1999, the others is Linux (Bill says so explicitly in this email, too.) Obviously, we find similar anti-Windows rethoric en masse on Linux mailing list, and obviously it's been a few years since but I find myself asking if anything really changed in the top level of MS management, except perhaps that a few people realized that trying to make the Linux / FOSS crowd look like a ridiculous bunch of amateurs wouldn't work.
Or maybe we could patent something related to this.
NZZ Folio, the monthly that comes with my newspaper, had this topic in its January edition, sparking a few thoughts about capital punishment.
Why am I against capital punishment? Primarily, because no justice system will ever be safe (make no mistakes, know no abuse.) Then there is the fact that life is something special and isn't ours to take away, but on the other hand, we assume that it's ok for us to judge that somebody should be locked in the rest of his life, and I'm not quite sure how big that difference is.
Ok, I one thought. Everything else I was going to write was just technical stuff on the execution of death penalty, which I have established I'm against. This engineer's brain can't stop thinking yes but what if ...
Next.